| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Research  |
|
|
|
| |
| |
Ambivalent response in pathogen defense: A double-edged sword?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 Authours
|
Chi-Yeol Kim1,2,3, Hyeunjeong Song4, and Yong-Hwan Lee1,2,3,4,5* |
| Title |
Ambivalent response in pathogen defense: A double-edged sword? |
| Journal |
, 2022 (3) ~ |
Abstract
|
Plants possess effective immune systems that defend against most microbial attackers. Recent plant immunity research has focused on the classic binary defense model involving the pivotal role of small-molecule hormones in regulating the plant defense signaling network. Although most of our current understanding comes from studies that relied on information derived from a limited number of pathosystems, newer studies concerning the incredibly diverse interactions between plants and microbes are providing additional insights into other novel mechanisms. Here, we review the roles of both classical and more recently identified components of defense signaling pathways and stress hormones in regulating the ambivalence effect during responses to diverse pathogens. Because of their different lifestyles, effective defense against biotrophic pathogens normally leads to increased susceptibility to necrotrophs, and vice versa. Given these opposing forces, the plant potentially faces a trade-off when it mounts resistance to a specific pathogen, a phenomenon referred to here as the ambivalence effect. We also highlight a novel mechanism by which translational control of the proteins involved in the ambivalence effect can be used to engineer durable and broad-spectrum disease resistance, regardless of the lifestyle of the invading pathogen. |
Link
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
